Denotation
refers to the words explicit or direct meaning, as opposed to connotation that
refers to an idea or felling that a word invokes. As an example take the
words home, house, residence and dwelling. They all share the same denotation,
that they are places where people live, but they each have different
connotations. Words like the ones listed are synonyms of one another, a synonym
being a word that shares a denotation with another word. But you must be asking
how this answers the question? Well if these words weren’t different from one
another then it would be pointless to have these words. Their difference lies
in their connotations. Connotations can very based on a persons schema and
should be kept in mind when reading a specific piece but certain connotations
can be generalized. So if you were to analyze the word based on positive and
negative connotations, home would be the most positive, house and residence
indifferent and dwelling negative. If you still cant see how these is important
I would urge you read a classic poem and then reflect on how it makes you feel.
As soon as you start to feel you are using connotations and not denotation thus
showing that language us ore than connotations.
Language is a human capacity, one that separates
Human beings from other living beings. Yes other animals can communicate but
there is no animal that uses both spoken sound and written language. Animals
communicate, they can signal danger in the flap of the fluke to screeching cries
but they cannot have a passionate discussion about politics in their
communities. Now More than ever, humans can communicate not only the
rudimentary but also the most complex of ideas. Language is our primary form of symbolic
communication; with each word being associated to and idea, concept, definition
and so on; complemented by math, art, maps, and scientific models. Consider the
most common signs in your daily lives, form the ale to female bathroom o
flammable on hairspray and deodorant cans. These are simple symbols that we
learn as we grow up using the information we have learnt. Now think of the words
that you use when speaking, these are complex symbols. As humans we have the ability
to move from symbolism and to use our sounds as meaningful communication. We
are able to connect our experience to those of others. But for the right message to be received we need
to use more than words, we need body language and tone. Tone and body language
are the things that can express what you ‘feel’, if are you angry, sad or ecstatic.
Your tone and body language can convey these things. Imagine someone who speaks
with no indication of emotion in his or her tone or body language. The monotonous
voice would sound the same when they were mad or when happy. This would make it
extremely difficult to comprehend and perceive what he truly meant while he
spoke. If language were purely
denotation then it would be like speaking to Sheldon cooper from the big bang
theory in the first seasons. It would be speaking with someone who interprets
everything you say with the definition and not the connotation, someone who
does not express emotion like others, and it would be an infuriating
conversation. But because not everyone we talk to is like this then we can
assume that language is not purely denotation because we se signs, tone, body
language among others to communicate effectively with others.
Language has become a collection of symbols that
all have meaning though some are not as simple as others; it is jumble of
nouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, synonyms and antonyms. Yet it is something
that comes so naturally that Chomsky, a linguist from he 70s, claims that it is
an innate ability. Language is no longer rudimentary but a highly developed
human characteristic, one that is influenced and influences perspective.
Nice work, Nina. Your example of the different words for house is excellent and will take you a long way. Having a ready example from poetry would also help, as would gathering some examples from the other languages that you speak. I really like the way you incorporate Chomsky's nativist idea here. You may want to go further with that. His idea of "universal grammar" is now considered kind of right and kind of wrong. Maybe you want to pursue that to give you better knowledge of psychology as well. I'd also like to see you partner some of your great original ideas with ideas from class or the texts we've looked at. Maybe put two together that are similar, or use them as counterclaims. Anyway,you're clearly on the right track. You went all the way to implications of the connotative nature of language, which I didn't even ask you to do.
ReplyDelete